directed by Larry Charles
with Bill Maher
A guy goes around talking to strangers and saying random things and then says have made a will document on religion.
There are movies that you can not see? No. Other than that, maybe. This film should be a documentary on religion, absolutely part (which is not a defect), a skeptical and scientific point of view. Unfortunately you do not save anything. First you need to see who is the protagonist: Bill Maher would, as mentioned above, a film critic on religion from a scientific point of view, the problem is that he knows nothing about it 'religion will' of science: as seen since the beginning of the film holder is in fact a failed comedian of the '80s. The only
notions about religion are pure American style, seem directly taken from a fourth-rate website, obviously out of context and without logic. I can not really grasp a coherent argument in everything that is said.
So far we have already identified a bad product, but still you could do a few laughs in the face of this kind convinced of what he says, and that, it is clear, says nonsense.
Think that will not get anywhere near a discussion with experts on the subject (God forbid!, The tenant would not hold even a second!): In fact the first to be interviewed, the topic of truck drivers (absurd but true) and so on between committed religious tourists to gift shops and many American-style plastic reconstruction of the Holy Land (even an actor playing Jesus, who knows, maybe they thought he was talking to the real one), all known to experts in theological issues (...). OK. But here comes the best part, everything falls here, and you'll fatigue while seeing to believe: to illustrate the guidelines of a religion minor American films is a bum (!) in London (London, what does?) delirious screaming in the middle of a square for a piece of bread and cited in this case religion. But let's move on. Another topic is the interview, in Amsterdam, a type of 'fact' that claims to have created a religion (the name does not even know him, there are followers, not tell us anything, there is no doubt that is a farce), and the entire interview was conducted while the guy is under the influence of drugs: here, as in all (everyone) the other dialogues, are mounted in video subtitle disparaging (but the interviewer could not speak ?) TV-style trash.
When he feels that 1) Maher does not know the famous Galilean interpretation of the Bible, that it was written without scientific criteria and should be placed in a specific historical context (the Bible is true to the spirit, not about the science) that is reiterated in a brief interview with a clergyman of the Vatican: the interviewer makes a face numb and can not say nothing (do not get it?), 2) do not even know a word of philosophy, sees a mile away who has never read a book to life (see the mentioned sites decontestualizzanti), from Augustine to Thomas Popper regarding the Holocaust, let alone the Greeks; 3) has no concept of the Trinity in the One, from a logical point of view you could explain to a child of 10 years (again, maybe we do not get) 4) use as evidence for the nonexistence of God that not see (unfortunately I'm not exaggerating), then the doubts are growing.
But at some point you realize that the film can be dangerous: the author does not try something, and convinced you are right: people often laugh in your face (but joking!?), Comes to be explicitly racist against Jews and Muslims portrays, this is unacceptable, all (everyone) Muslims as fanatical terrorists and suicide, apportions all (all) the evils of the world religions. The final scenes do come
shudder: we see how Maher can not in any way to distinguish between religion and politics, and it says explicitly that if religions are not uprooted the world will end.
not let the world fanatics. Let us not allow the information to the ignorant. This film is a warning.
OVERALL: Do not judge ignominy (less than 0 / 10).
0 comments:
Post a Comment